5 Reasons Your Reconsideration Request Would certainly Fail

November 20th, 2013 by admin Leave a reply »

The removal of a manual unnatural links charges can be extremely difficult. If you’ve gone through the approach then you’re likely familiar with each of our mixture of excitement and fear that accompanies seeing “All Messages (1)” in Google Webmaster Tools after filing when considering reconsideration.

Will you know “Manual Spam Action Revoked”? Quite possibly will it be the dreaded, “Links to your website violate Google’s quality guidelines”? Getting your latter message means that your reconsideration request has not been successful and that whole lot work needs to be done in order to raise your penalty.

Often times though, Google doesn’t give much management when it comes to understanding why a reconsideration request was denied. They may give out some examples of unnatural links, except for always. Sometimes absolutely no explanation has as the reason for failure.

One thing I do on a regular basis is summary the reconsideration requests for businesses where haven’t been able to lift that penalty. Here are eight of the most likely reasons why reconsideration requests have were not successful.


1 . Not Enough Not naturally made Links Addressed

Lessen, by far, the most common reason for a reconsideration to fail. It isn’t enough to go just after just the worst links, or even many unnatural links. In most cases, Google wants to be able to that you have identified close to 100 percent associated with the unnatural links.

Webmasters in forums often proclaim such thinggs as, “I removed 3, 000 websites and Google still failed basically! ” In one of these cases, days owner had indeed removed a couple of, 000 links all from small quality directories, bookmarks and thought spam. However , they still bought hundreds of articles in existence that presented unnatural links to their site. Days owners felt that those links was natural because the sites who created the articles made an article choice to publish them. But in actual fact, it was a linking scheme. That will site won’t get their penalty extracted until those links are concentrated on.

(As an in reserve, “addressed” doesn’t necessarily mean, “removed”. All that Google wants to see is that you have founded which links are unnatural and you have made a thorough attempt to get the websites removed. And if you couldn’t may help links, then you have disavowed web page. )

If your reconsideration requests are repeatedly failing, may be worthwhile to have someone take a target look at your link profile. There exists links that you feel are environmentally friendly, but Google does not.

Sometimes, posting a question in the Gmail Webmaster Forumscan help. The volunteers there will give their opinion inside your backlink profile. However , be warned where sometimes the responses you get from this forum can be a little snarky, and there is less guarantee that the answers will be 100 % correct. That said, there is a possibility you could uncover links that you felt was natural, but really aren’t environmentally friendly in Google’s eyes.


2 . Not Enough Effort Was Made to cut out Unnatural Links

For those who a manual unnatural links charges, it isn’t enough to just disavow our bad links. Google needs to observe that you have thoroughly tried to remove quite a few unnatural links as possible.

If you have the login credentials to article directories and articles where you have submitted websites, then log in and remove them. Indicate to Google in your reconsideration request you’ve done this. It may even help to manufacture a Google Doc spreadsheet that show each domain and the date about what you went in and extracted your links or deleted your account and also indicates the ones where you were unable to log in or had other sorts of difficulties.

If you don’t inspectie the pages where your websites reside, then you need to do all you can to make contact with the site owner. Show Google during your spreadsheet that you have collected any email addresses you could find, the whois email address also URL of any contact form, Twitter world-wide-web site or Facebook page. Then, book the date on which you tried your hand at this form of contact.

I usually like to add additional System.Drawing.Bitmap about my communications with website owners as well by entering things into the organization spreadsheet like, “Site owner expressed they will remove links but still is not done – re-emailed, ” or sometimes “Site owner wanted $100 to get a link – will disavow”. This is what shows Google that you truly executed spend time contacting webmasters.

I used to advocate showing Google a copy of every email that we sent. However , John Mueller recently said in your hangout that this was probably not important.


3. Not Enough Outline

When writing each reconsideration request, you don’t need to write a fresco, but you do need to write enough in convince the webspam team you’ve been working hard to remove as many chemical links as possible. Hereis a Web master Forum thread where John Mueller says the following to a site resident who has failed at reconsideration:


One of the things we noticed was that your last reconsideration request must have been a bit short & basic, which always when taken on its own, gave the team a wrong impression about the steps you could have taken to resolve this issue on the web…. My general recommendation for reconsideration requests would be to make sure that you’re in actual fact submitting the right & relevant answers there, so that it’s clear for those processing the request what considerations you’ve taken to resolve this issue: ensuring that to the doc you mentioned is substantial, linking to a forum discussion is substantial, providing more context in the voice message directly is also very useful.

For more information on how to write a thorough reconsideration request, see “Google Reconsideration Receive Guidelines & Example”.


4. Improperly Formatted Disavow Image

In many cases, Google will let you know, when you submit your disavow author, whether there is an error in your author.

In the past, if you had supplied a. rtf file instead of a. txt, or if you had forgotten to use each of our domain: operator when you wanted to disavow an entire domain, you would receive less indication from Google that your disavow file would not work.

Now, after you upload the author, if there is a problem with its syntax, you will receive an error message.

Disavow Links Error

Even with sorts of warnings, it is still possible for a reconsideration request to fail because of a disavow author problem. In one situation, a reconsideration failed and Google gave for illustration links that the site owner bought attempted to remove, and when unsuccessful, bought put in their disavow file. Or thereabouts they thought.

It had been that the disavow file was lost every domain that started using letters K to Z. This is most likely because of a glitch in Google Documents that sometimes causes only a couple of cells of a spreadsheet to be pasted when using the copy and paste purpose. Only the domains starting with 0-J was transferred to the disavow which resulted in a huge number of domains the disavow author were missing.

Really want double check that your disavow file created all of the domains and URLs you wish to disavow!


5. Disavowing on the URL Level Instead of the Blog Level

I normally disavow links on the domain measure. The rare exception would be when considering sites where we had an chemical link from one page but Since i felt we could get natural websites from other pages on this site. This doesn’t a bit more very often.

Here’s an instance that explains why it’s important to disavow on the domain level. Let’s say I have a paid link embedded in a write-up of a site that is based on the Movable type CMS and that link exists inside following URL:

http://www.example.com/myarticle.html

The best way to disavow the idea link would be to include the following in doing my disavow file:

ip: example. com

But , let’s say that I included the following in doing my disavow instead:

http://www.example.com/myarticle.html

Because this site has always been WordPress based, there is a good oppuntity that the following links pointing to my site also exist:

http://www.example.com/
http://www.example.com/category/spammyarticles/
http://www.example.com/tag/links/
http://www.example.com/tag/anothertag/
http://www.example.com/author/mariehaynes/
http://www.example.com/date/2013/11/
… and many more.

Similarly, some sites may have the connection available on a www page, each non www page and also a new great https:// page.

Disavowing on the domain level will take good care of all of these links.


few. Google Docs Wasn’t Used for Speaking Evidence

In this video, Google’s Matt Cutts explains that the webspam team has always been reluctant to open up external info for fear of getting malware. That they recommends that you keep everything in Google Docs.

It isn’t a good idea to use an Excel spreadsheet to book your evidence. You can upload a new great Excel spreadsheet to Google Documents, but I do find that often sorts of files are difficult to process indicates when viewed in Google Docs. If possible, it really is best to show your information in your Google Spreadsheet.

Iv got also seen failed reconsiderations precisely site owners didn’t document their endeavors at contacting site owners well. The fact is, they gave the password to Gmail account and invited each of our webspam team to view their Made folder. It’s very unlikely that a Gmail employee is going to do this, mostly when considering privacy reasons.

The fact is, document everything really well in a Gmail Doc Spreadsheet. Include the email address, who is address, contact form URL, etc . basically used and the date on which the person tried that form of contact. Ensure it is as simple as possible for a webspam sports team employee to see your efforts.


7. Incorrect Google Docs Recommend Settings

If you’re giving a Google Doc with the webspam team, be sure that the share or perhaps are not set to “Private”, which is each of our default setting. I usually change it in “Anyone with the link can view”.

In this Webmaster Forums post, a Google employee has always been describing possible reasons for this site user’s failure to get reconsidered. One of the things he says is:


Documentation is basically good and can help when interviewing your site for reconsideration. Make sure that for those who send in documentation that it’s accessible, however ,. It looks like https://docs. google. com/file/….. were shared properly.

Specifically tragic! Months of work can go to waste if the webspam team can’t see your documentation.

You would suspect that Google would simply let you know that they will not see your documentation. Unfortunately, it appears that these individuals only have a limited number of canned comments they can give. It would be great if Google could add an additional processed response that told a site resident that there was a problem viewing that documentation and perhaps gave a from a caterer of possible problem areas.


8. Spreadsheet is Filtered

This is very similar to the previous link. If you have your Google Spreadsheet go over settings set so that anyone with the connection can view the document, this installing does not allow the viewer to use each of our filter function.

Iv got reviewed some failed requests disorders site owner had accidentally stored the spreadsheet filtered so that they have the ability to just see the links they were cost-effective in removing, or in another reason, for some reason they were looking at just that directory links. This means that webspam team member who saw your request didn’t want to see the rest of the spreadsheet.

Unless you have been really successful inside the removing links, if the webspam sports team can’t see the work that you have completed try to contact site owners then they will likely deliver a canned “Links to your site defy Google’s quality guidelines” message, therefore you have failed at reconsideration. It’s possible that this is the reason why some site owners acquire examples of unnatural links that are our that they have tried to remove.

If the webspam team can’t see your efforts, then they may assume you got just disavowed this link rather than just tried to remove it.


Last part

Did Google associated with process of applying for reconsideration of a website so difficult so site owners learn that lesson and never want to build chemical links again? Perhaps.

If you’re one of the unlucky ones hard to get a penalty removed, don’t let go! Some sites have had to go through a multitude of requests before finally succeeding, even so I’ve yet to see one that seemed to be impossible! Hopefully these tips will help.

If you know of other reasons as to the reasons a reconsideration request may forget, please leave a comment.


SES London
Bringing Together Paid, Run and Earned Media
Feb. 10-13, 2014: This year’s SES Vomiting agenda focuses on aligning paid, looked after and earned media to help you build quality traffic and increase ralentissement.
Register early and put away!
*Saver Rate terminates Dec 13.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.